Christopher James Huff wrote:
> 
> Looks interesting, I'll take a look at it. I assume I can change
> licenses with later releases if I want...the code is mine, right?
> Hopefully I'll be uploading an alpha of CSDL later today...I'll probably
> just cook up a "do not redistribute or use this code" statement, at
> least until it gets out of alpha/beta stage.
> The complete lack of response this got is surprising considering the
> past discussion POV-Ray licensing has received...maybe putting
> "Licensing" in the subject line will help. ;-)
> 

I suppose the main reason for the lack of interest are the problems
understanding what this can be good for, if you release something
including samples for usage i think the interest will be larger (assuming
it's really something useful of course... ;-))

The Perl Artistic License has the advantage that it forces a distinction
of the original version and custom extensions, apart from that it's much
like GPL i think.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message